Re: [PATCH 0/9] strict user copy checks on x86_64

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> 
> It looks like 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 got picked up. Should I resend the left
> over patches with appropriate acked-bys and tags? Would it be
> appropriate to push this through your tree?
> 

I was first going to think I'd pick up 8 and 9 in tip, but since 9 is
cross-architecture, Andrew's tree might be better.

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/