Re: [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re:__elv_add_request OOPS]
From: Parag Warudkar
Date: Wed May 25 2011 - 14:45:00 EST
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Jens Axboe wrote:
> While this will fix your particular oops, I don't think it's quite
> right. It's fixing one particular piece of fall out from attempting to
> talk to a removed device, it's not necessarily fixing the full class of
> them. The other checks in scsi_set_medium_removal() aren't related to a
> changing state of the device, they are capability checks.
Below patch pushes the check down to ioctl functions and hopefully should
cover more ioctl-on-gone-device cases by returning -ENXIO if an attempt
was made to submit request to a non-running device.
With this patch in place - instead of oopsing I now get a proper I/O error
on resume.
AFAICT from my limited SCSI layer knowledge - these seem to be the right
places to check. Would be interested in knowing if there are better/more
complete ways to handle this but if they are going to take time IMHO it
certainly doesn't hurt to keep the below patch in.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
index d9564fb..c32cade 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ static int ioctl_internal_command(struct scsi_device *sdev, char *cmd,
int result;
struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+ if (!sdev || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL
+ || sdev->sdev_state > SDEV_QUIESCE)
+ return -ENXIO;
+
SCSI_LOG_IOCTL(1, printk("Trying ioctl with scsi command %d\n", *cmd));
result = scsi_execute_req(sdev, cmd, DMA_NONE, NULL, 0,
@@ -195,8 +199,9 @@ int scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *sdev, int cmd, void __user *arg)
{
char scsi_cmd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
- /* No idea how this happens.... */
- if (!sdev)
+ /* No idea how !sdev happens.... */
+ if (!sdev || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL
+ || sdev->sdev_state > SDEV_QUIESCE)
return -ENXIO;
/*
@@ -288,6 +293,10 @@ int scsi_nonblockable_ioctl(struct scsi_device *sdev, int cmd,
{
int val, result;
+ if (!sdev || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL
+ || sdev->sdev_state > SDEV_QUIESCE)
+ return -ENXIO;
+
/* The first set of iocts may be executed even if we're doing
* error processing, as long as the device was opened
* non-blocking */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/