Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision

[Ingo Molnar]

* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 25 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > So displaying a non-fatal 'info' message about it would in fact 
> > be rather wise. Nothing scary, but we'd like to be informed.
> 
> A printk with levels info or notice, I do agree to be a good idea.  
> In fact, I like the idea a lot.
> 
> WARN() and kernel tainting, which is what I understand was being 
> proposed before, I cannot agree with.

Yeah, the taint is probably overdoing it - especially considering 
that mixing certain steppings is explicitly supported.

> OTOH, IMO mismatched microcode should be grounds for more serious 
> measures. And that includes fixing the annoying userspace ABI that 
> encourages bad behaviour in the first place and makes it harder to 
> do the proper thing.

Well, a problem the microcode driver has is that it needs that 
microcode blob. So we cannot really load it right at bootup (unless 
we promote the image to the initrd - somewhat hairy).

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/