Re: pch_gpio: Support new device ML7223

[Alexander Stein]

On Thursday 26 May 2011 03:24:55 Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> > From: Alexander Stein [mailto:alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 9:10 PM
> > 
> > > #define pch_gpio_resume NULL  #endif
> > > 
> > > +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_ROHM             0x10DB
> > 
> > Should this be moved to pci_ids.h?
> 
> OK.
> I will move this to pci_ids.h.
> 
> > >  static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(pch_gpio_pcidev_id) = {
> > >  
> > >  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x8803) },
> > > 
> > > +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ROHM, 0x8014) },
> > 
> > Likewise for the product ID. While at it, the ID for EG20T
> > could also be moved in a separate patch.
> 
> We have already upstreamed not only GPIO but also many device drivers(GBE,
> USBDEV,DMA,UART,SPI,I2C,CAN). Do you mean we must move these device
> definitions to pci_ids.h?

I just meant to move 0x8803 from the line above into pci_ids.h. It is 
unrelated to your patch.
And if this _must_ be moved to pci_ids.h I'm the wrong person to decide.

Regards,
Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/