Re: [PATCH v3 resend] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Handle Cisco 7941/7945IP phones

[Pablo Neira Ayuso]

On 26/05/11 19:57, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 mai 2011 Ã 18:50 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso a Ãcrit :
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 20/05/11 06:36, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
>>> Most SIP devices use a source port of 5060/udp on SIP requests, so the
>>> response automatically comes back to port 5060:
>>>
>>> phone_ip:5060 -> proxy_ip:5060   REGISTER
>>> proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060   100 Trying
>>>
>>> The newer Cisco IP phones, however, use a randomly chosen high source
>>> port for the SIP request but expect the response on port 5060:
>>>
>>> phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060  REGISTER
>>> proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060   100 Trying
>>>
>>> Standard Linux NAT, with or without nf_nat_sip, will send the reply back
>>> to port 49173, not 5060:
>>>
>>> phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060  REGISTER
>>> proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:49173  100 Trying
>>>
>>> But the phone is not listening on 49173, so it will never see the reply.
>>>
>>> This patch modifies nf_*_sip to work around this quirk by extracting
>>> the SIP response port from the Via: header, iff the source IP in the
>>> packet header matches the source IP in the SIP request.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> @Eric: could you please confirm that you ack'ed this patch? I don't find
>> the email with your explicit ack.
> 
> Yes I did it ;)
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter/msg49632.html
> 
> Thanks !

OK, applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/