Re: [PATCH] trace: Add a free on close control mechanism forbuffer_size_kb
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu May 26 2011 - 14:23:55 EST
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 11:00 -0700, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > What you should do is just check if ret is less than zero here.
> >
> > if (ret < 0)
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> Instead, I don't have to check/set the return value. I can just return
> "ret" to the caller.
Actually, ret could be -1, if we end up with a miss match in global vs
max buffers. But that is more of an anomaly. Maybe the solution there is
to have that return -ENOMEM as well?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/