Re: [git pull] gpio changes for $NEXT_KERNEL

From: Grant Likely
Date: Thu May 26 2011 - 21:39:18 EST


On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:14:49AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:12:02 -0600 Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Due to my own stupidity, this branch as /not/ been tested through
> > linux-next. I put it in a branch that I negelcted to ask Stephen to
> > include. :-( I'm asking him to add it for tonight. At the very
> > least, it has been build tested on various x86, powerpc, mips, sparc
> > and arm defconfigs.
> >
> > You'll probably want to hold off on actually pulling this one, but I
> > wanted to give you a heads up that I have it still pending. If you've
> > not picked it up, then I can resend the pull req tomorrow afternoon
> > after confirming it hasn't messed up anything in linux-next.
> >
> > There's nothing earth shattering here. Just a bunch of driver updates
> > and some faltering steps towards unifying a bunch of the mmio gpio
> > logic.
> >
> > g.
> >
> > The following changes since commit 4db70f73e56961b9bcdfd0c36c62847a18b7dbb5:
> >
> > tmpfs: fix XATTR N overriding POSIX_ACL Y (2011-05-25 19:53:02 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 gpio/next
>
> I have added this tree even though it looks like Linus took it - just in
> case there is more stuff.
>
> If you think it is unnecessary, let me know.

Thanks Stephen. It's not unnecessary. I'll be adding more stuff to
that branch for the next cycle.

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/