Re: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership

[viresh kumar]

On 05/19/2011 07:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > i asked this because we wanted to send the source codes of
>> > CSR(http://www.csr.com) to upstream as i have told you in LDS. it
>> > looks like we need to follow the below new changes to make our source
>> > codes acceptable?
>> > 1. arm device tree
>> > 2. new pinmux framework from Linus Walleij
>> > 3. move GPIO from plat/mach to drivers/gpio?
> I would count at least the last two as mandatory, for the device tree,
> it depends on how much work it would be for you to do the conversion
> and at what time you submit the series. The longer you wait before
> submitting the series, the stricter the requirements will get.
> 

Arnd,

We also have few patchsets for ST's SPEAr SOC family. They were already
reviewed, but never got pushed.

We will update all those pacthsets for point 2 & 3, and leave point 1 for now.
Also we will update them with our latest changes for SPEAr and will circulate
them ASAP.

Hope that's fine.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/