Re: [ORLinux] [PATCH 1/1] Apply transparent_union attribute tounion semun
From: Jeremy Bennett
Date: Fri May 27 2011 - 04:45:18 EST
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 00:27 +0200, jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Jonas Bonn <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The syscall handler for semctl is written under the assumption that the
> toolchain will pass "small" unions as function parameters directly instead
> of by reference. The union semun is "small" and thus fits this description.
>
> Since it is assumed that the union will be passed directly and not by
> reference, it is safe to access the union members without going via
> get_user.
>
> The OpenRISC architecture, however, passes all unions by reference, thus
> breaking the above assumption.
Hi Jonas
Joern and I were discussing this - there is a case for changing the ABI.
It would certainly fix a debugging issue.
> The technically correct fix here is to mark the union as being transparent
> so that the ABI of the union's first element determines the parameter
> passing method and thus make explicit what's already implied in the function
> definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Bonn <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/sem.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sem.h b/include/linux/sem.h
> index f2961af..6985c7d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sem.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ union semun {
> unsigned short __user *array; /* array for GETALL & SETALL */
> struct seminfo __user *__buf; /* buffer for IPC_INFO */
> void __user *__pad;
> -};
> +} __attribute__ ((transparent_union));
>
> struct seminfo {
> int semmap;
Excellent. Semaphore test now passes. I look forward to rerunning
regression - we may be down to a single failure now!
Best wishes,
Jeremy
--
Tel: +44 (1590) 610184
Cell: +44 (7970) 676050
SkypeID: jeremybennett
Email: jeremy.bennett@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.embecosm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/