Re: [PATCH 0/7] Move Qualcomm gpio drivers into drivers dir

[David Brown]

On Fri, May 27 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> On Fri, 27 May 2011, David Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, May 27 2011, David Brown wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 26 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:50:46PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
>> >>> This patch series moves the Qualcomm MSM gpio device drivers into the
>> >>> drivers/gpio directory.
>> >>> 
>> >>> The MSM's have two flavors of gpio driver.  The one for the newer
>> >>> v7-based chips is a bit cleaner, and can just be moved.  The one for
>> >>> the older v6-based chips took some cleanup to get rid of numerous
>> >>> ifdefs based on the particular machine.  Both drivers can now be
>> >>> selected and will be used on appropriate targets.
>> >>> 
>> >>> There is still a minor entanglement with the MSM-specific gpiomux
>> >>> code.  This will be cleaned up as MSM moves to use pinmux.
>> >>> 
>> >>> David Brown (7):
>> >>>   msm: gpio: Remove unsupported devices
>> >>>   msm: Remove chip-ifdefs for GPIO io mappings
>> >>>   msm: gpio: Remove chip-specific register definitions
>> >>>   msm: gpio: Remove ifdefs on gpio chip registers
>> >>>   msm: gpiomux: Move public API to public header
>> >>>   gpio_msm: Move Qualcomm v6 MSM driver into drivers
>> >>>   gpio_msm: Move Qualcomm MSM v2 gpio driver into drivers
>> >>
>> >> What's the status of this series.  I only got cc'd on the last two
>> >> patches; did you want me to pick up the whole lot, or is it being
>> >> merged via the msm tree?
>> >
>> > Let me send out an update, incorporating the suggestions.  I need to
>> > rebase these changes off of the current MSM code, since the msm-next
>> > tree contains changes that aren't going into the merge window because of
>> > extra ARM scrutiny.
>> >
>> >> Alternately, if there is a git branch with these patches in it, then I
>> >> can merge that instead of applying individually.
>> >
>> > I'll send you a pull request after I send out the updates.
>> 
>> Oh, and in case it isn't clear, I wasn't expecting these to make it into
>> this merge window.
>
> Why not?

They haven't been tested in linux-next for one, but more importantly, I
have to redo them to not include the msm-core changes that aren't going
to be going in.

I'm probably not going to be able to get to this until next week.

David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/