Re: [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 05/27/2011 02:37 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/27/2011 11:05 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> You can load the kernel at the same virtual address we always load it,
>> and/or perhaps shift it up by just small amounts (ie "single pages"
>> rather than "ten bits worth of pages")
>>
>> And then rely on the fact that you mixed up symbols in other ways.
>>
> 
> OK, here is a bat-shit-crazy idea... an all-module kernel where nothing
> except init code is prelinked at all.
> 
> If we could modularize the core code we could have init code load the
> modules at all kinds of random addresses; they wouldn't even need to be
> contiguous in memory, and since we'd have full access to the memory
> layout at that point, we can randomize the **** out of *everything*.
> 

Thinking about it some more, it might not be that crazy.  Consider the
following notion: the kernel payload, as delivered by the decompressor,
contains the init code, plus a set of modules, which can be ELF modules,
but don't have to be (but since we already have code to load and link
ELF modules it is probably be the best choice.)

After we initialize the system enough to have a memory map, we can pick
a random place for each module, copy it in place, fix up the
relocations, and free the original location.

If we are exceptionally clever, which of course we are, we could even
have these modules linked to their initial location and fix up
references in running code, that way init code could still call module
code, as long as it doesn't stash away pointers to module data.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/