Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] x86-64: Document some of entry_64.S

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> (And whose idea was it to have pushing the error code be optional?)

I think it must have been some genius trying to save 0.1 cycles while 
spending a thousand transistors on it in the critical path and 
introducing a dozen crashes and security holes into various kernels 
;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/