Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86-64: Remove syscall instructions at fixed addresses

[Andrew Lutomirski]

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> [...] More importantly, vread_tsc contains an alternative and the
>> vDSO can't currently contain alternative instructions.  That can
>> probably be fixed, but it'll take a bit of work.
>
> You could start with picking the more compatible alternative
> instruction initially. I don't at all mind losing half a cycle of
> performance in that case ... this code should be secure first.

The more compatible one is mfence, which in some cases could (I think)
be a lot more than half a cycle.

A better option might be rdtscp, which is actually documented to work,
but I'm not sure it's available on all supported CPUs.

I'm content to wait a bit on this one.  I say let's get the rest done
first and tackle the last little hard part at the end.

--Andy

>
> Thanks,
>
>        Ingo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/