Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix-up free space earlier in mount_ubifs()
From: Matthew L. Creech
Date: Tue May 31 2011 - 10:44:00 EST
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Ben Gardiner
<bengardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In testing Mattew Creech's free-space-fixup flag series I found that was unable
> to boot a da850evm which had flashed to it's NAND a ubinized image containing a
> UBIFS that has the free-space-fixup flag set.
>
> The cause of the problem was found to be the call to ubifs_write_master() from
> mount_ubifs() as is evidenced the backtrace produced by the assertion
> introduced in the first patch of this series; where the assertion introduced is
> that c->space_fixup is false when ubifs_write_node() is called.
>
Interesting - so the problem is that if ubifs_read_master() resizes
the master node, a subsequent attempt to read the first (c->mst_offs +
c->mst_node_alsz) bytes from the master LEB fails?
I wonder why this is the case when free-space fixup is enabled, and
not otherwise? The -EBADMSG seems to imply that this is the original
problem that the fix-up is intended to solve - i.e. the master node
has empty pages with non-empty OOB values, and writing to them results
in a bogus ECC.
Do you happen to know if the same thing occurs when you uncleanly
reboot (so that recovery is needed on the next boot)? It looks like
ubifs_recover_master_node() reads the same data that
fixup_leb_free_space() does, so I'd expect it to fail similarly if
that's what's happening, regardless of whether fix-up is performed or
not.
Just trying to fully understand the error. :) That aside, this patch
set makes sense to me. Thanks!
--
Matthew L. Creech
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/