Re: m68k: Convert to genirq (WIP)

[Thomas Gleixner]

Geert,

On Tue, 31 May 2011, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 20:32, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Next on my list is Amiga, which will cover autovectored and chained interrupts.
> 
> Plain chained interrupts should be handled by calling irq_set_chained_handler()
> to register an irq_flow_handler_t, and let the handler call
> generic_handle_irq() for
> each successive interrupt, right?
> 
> However, on Amiga we have interrupts (IRQ_AMIGA_PORTS and
> IRQ_AMIGA_EXTER) that are a combination of chained (for the CIA interrupt
> controllers) and shared level interrupts (for motherboard hardware and
> Zorro expansion
> boards).
> But irq_set_chained_handler() sets IRQ_NOREQUEST, i.e. the interrupt cannot
> be requested anymore via request_irq(), so this rules out using it with shared
> level interrupts.
> 
> What's the preferred way to handle this? Is there are standard way, or should I
> write my own specialized irq_flow_handler_t that handles both?
> 
> In the old scheme, we just registered the chain handlers with
> request_irq(), so they
> worked nicely together with the shared level interrupts (cfr.
> arch/m68k/amiga/cia.c)

You still can setup all those handlers setup via request_irq() and
handle the demux part by calling generic_handle_irq() from the handler
which deals with that demux hardware. irq_set_chained_handler() is
merily an optimization which does not apply to potentially shared
primary interrupts.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/