On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 19:20 +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:On 01.06.2011 18:35, Peter Zijlstra wrote:On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:58 +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:git bisect blames this commit for a problem I have with v3.0-rc1:
If I printk large amounts of data, the machine locks up.
As the commit does not revert cleanly on top of 3.0, I haven't been
able to double check.
The test I use is simple, just add something like
for (i=0; i< 10000; ++i) printk("test %d\n", i);
and trigger it, in most cases I can see the first 10 printks before
I have to power cycle the machine (sysrq-b does not work anymore).
Attached my .config.
I've made me a module that does the above, I've also changed my .config
to match yours (smp=y, sched-cgroup=y, autogroup=n, preempt=n, no_hz=y),
but sadly I cannot reproduce, I get all 10k prints on my serial line.
Even without serial line it works (somehow booting without visible
console is scary as hell :)
Which makes me ask, how are you observing your console?
They don't go out to the serial line, I only observe them with a
tail -f on messages. Default log level doesn't go the console here.
Right ok, so I used your exact .config, added a few drivers needed for
my hardware and indeed, it doesn't even finish booting and gets stuck
someplace.
Sadly it looks like even the NMI watchdog is dead,.. /me goes try and
make sense of this.
Sadly both 0122ec5b02f766c355b3168df53a6c038a24fa0d^1 and
0122ec5b02f766c355b3168df53a6c038a24fa0d itself boot just fine and run
the test module without problems.
I will have to re-bisect this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/