Re: /proc/stat btime accuracy problem

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:35 PM, john stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:50 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> timekeeping_init() basically does the following:
>>
>>     xtime = RTC
>>     if (arch implements read_boot_clock())
>>         wall_to_monotonic = -read_boot_clock()
>>     else
>>       wall_to_monotonic = -xtime
>>
>> So wall_to_monotonic records some approximation of the system boot
>> time, which is then used to derive the "btime" reported in /proc/stat.
>>
>> The problem I'm seeing is that xtime is updated on timer ticks, so
>> uninterruptible code, like kernel serial printk, makes us miss ticks,
>> so xtime falls behind the RTC.
>
> Huh. So this sort of issue was common back when we had tick-based
> timekeeping (in combination with troubled hardware), but with the
> current clocksource based timekeeping, occasional lost ticks shouldn't
> really effect time.

Makes sense.  Your presentation here was a great help:
  http://sr71.net/~jstultz/tod/ols-presentation-final.pdf

> Can you explain a bit more about what kind of hardware this is happening
> on, and what clocksource is being used?

Sure.  This is an x86 box.  Normally we're using the TSC clocksource,
and I don't think the issue happens after that.  I guess my
experimentation so far has been with uninterruptible time before we
register *any* clocksource (or at least before I see any "Switching to
clocksource" messages).

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/