Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] clocksource: add db8500 PRCMU timer

From: Mattias Wallin
Date: Thu Jun 02 2011 - 08:10:25 EST


On 06/02/2011 01:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:18:35PM +0200, Mattias Wallin wrote:
On 06/02/2011 11:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Why don't we just find a way of fixing sched_clock so that the value
doesn't reset over a suspend/resume cycle?
Even if the value isn't reset during suspend/resume we want the
clocksource to keep counting. Or is it ok to have the clocksource stop
or freeze during suspend?

kernel/time/timekeeping.c:timekeeping_suspend():

timekeeping_forward_now();

which does:
cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last)& clock->mask;
clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;

So that updates the time with the current offset between cycle_last and
the current value.

kernel/time/timekeeping.c:timekeeping_resume():
/* re-base the last cycle value */
timekeeper.clock->cycle_last = timekeeper.clock->read(timekeeper.clock);

So this re-sets cycle_last to the current value of the clocksource. This
means that on resume, the clocksource can start counting from any value it
likes.

So, without any additional external inputs, time resumes incrementing at
the point where the suspend occurred without any jump backwards or forwards.

The code accounts for the sleep time by using read_persistent_clock() read
a timer which continues running during sleep to calculate the delta between
suspend and resume, and injects the delta between them to wind the time
forward.

Then we have cpuidle. Is it ok to stop/freeze the timer during cpuidle
sleep states?

During _idle_ (iow, no task running) sched_clock and the clocksource
should both continue to run - the scheduler needs to know how long the
system has been idle for, and the clocksource can't stop because we'll
lose track of time.

Remember that the clockevent stuff is used as a trigger to the timekeeping
code to read the clocksource, and update the current time. Time is moved
forward by the delta between a previous clocksource read and the current
clocksource read. So stopping or resetting the clocksource in unexpected
ways (other than over suspend/resume as mentioned above) will result in
time going weird.

Hmm, I have missed the existence of the read_persistent_clock(). It sounds like I should keep the MTU as my clocksource / sched_clock and have the PRCMU Timer as a persistent_clock instead.

Then one problem remains. The MTU will be powered during cstates: running, wfi, ApIdle (arm retenetion). The MTU will loose power during cstates ApSleep and ApDeepSleep. So I need to do a similar sync as suspend does against the persistent_clock but when leaving and enter the deeper cstates.

Should I solve it in the clocksource framework with a flag telling which cstates the timer will stop/freeze and then inject time from the persistent_clock for those cstates? (I am thinking something like the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP flag)

Am I on the wrong track here or how should I solve it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/