Re: [PATCH] VLYNQ: vlynq_enable_device should try remote enabling first

[Florian Fainelli]

Andrew,

On Friday 11 March 2011 11:57:28 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> I noticed device lockups on TNETD7200 chips when vlynq_enable_device tried
> enabling the device in the following order: external -> local -> remote
> 
> inverting the external and remote order fixes the lock up and allows normal
> operation of the remote VLYNQ device on all TNETD generations (7100, 7200,
> 7300).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I did not get a feedback from you whether you applied this patch or not, it is
still valid though.

Thank you.

> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/vlynq/vlynq.c b/drivers/vlynq/vlynq.c
> index f885c86..0dd05ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/vlynq/vlynq.c
> +++ b/drivers/vlynq/vlynq.c
> @@ -516,9 +516,9 @@ static int __vlynq_enable_device(struct vlynq_device
> *dev) !__vlynq_try_external(dev))
>  				return 0;
>  		} else {
> -			if (!__vlynq_try_external(dev) ||
> -				!__vlynq_try_local(dev)    ||
> -				!__vlynq_try_remote(dev))
> +			if (!__vlynq_try_remote(dev) ||
> +				!__vlynq_try_local(dev)  ||
> +				!__vlynq_try_external(dev))
>  				return 0;
>  		}
>  		break;
> --
> 1.7.1

-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/