Re: thread leader death under strace (was Re: [PATCH 03/10]ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE)
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Thu Jun 02 2011 - 12:41:14 EST
On 06/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 06/02, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that right now it seems that if tracer doesn't catch
> > EVENT_EXIT and detach tracee when it sees it, really weird things
> > happen.
>
> The test-case is wrong afaics...
>
> Perhaps this should be considered as a bug in glibc, I dunno.
>
> > thread1(void *unused)
> > {
> > // usleep(100*1000);
> > // VERBOSE("WINCH\n");
> > // raise(SIGWINCH);
> >
> > usleep(100*1000);
> > VERBOSE("DYING\n");
> > raise(SIGUSR1);
>
> This doesn't send a signal. This does tgkill(tgid, 0, SIGUSR1) which
> fails correctly with -EINVAL.
>
> > static int
> > thread_leader(void *unused)
> > {
> > /* malloc gives sufficiently aligned buffer.
> > * long buf[] does not! (on ia64).
> > */
> > clone2(thread1, malloc(16 * 1024), 16 * 1024, 0
>
> Probably because of this clone2.
>
> Could you test with pthread_create? Or s/raise/tkill/ ?
Btw, did you use -lpthread?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/