Re: [PATCHv2 RFC 3/4] virtio_net: limit xmit polling

[Sridhar Samudrala]

On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:43 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Current code might introduce a lot of latency variation
> if there are many pending bufs at the time we
> attempt to transmit a new one. This is bad for
> real-time applications and can't be good for TCP either.
> 
> Free up just enough to both clean up all buffers
> eventually and to be able to xmit the next packet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |  106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index a0ee78d..b25db1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -509,17 +509,33 @@ again:
>  	return received;
>  }
> 
> -static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +static bool free_old_xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	unsigned int len;
> 
> -	while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->svq, &len)) != NULL) {
> -		pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> -		vi->dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
> -		vi->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
> -		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> -	}
> +	skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->svq, &len);
> +	if (unlikely(!skb))
> +		return false;
> +	pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> +	vi->dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
> +	vi->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
> +	dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* Check capacity and try to free enough pending old buffers to enable queueing
> + * new ones. Return true if we can guarantee that a following
> + * virtqueue_add_buf will succeed. */
> +static bool free_xmit_capacity(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	unsigned int len;
> +
> +	while (virtqueue_min_capacity(vi->svq) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2)
> +		if (unlikely(!free_old_xmit_skb))
> +			return false;
If we are using INDIRECT descriptors, 1 descriptor entry is good enough
to guarantee that an skb can be queued unless we run out of memory.
Is it worth checking if 'indirect' is set on the svq and then only free
1 descriptor? Otherwise, we will be dropping the packet if there are
less than 18 free descriptors although we ony need 1.


> +	return true;
>  }
> 
>  static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
> @@ -572,30 +588,34 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> -	int capacity;
> -
> -	/* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
> -	free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> -
> -	/* Try to transmit */
> -	capacity = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
> -
> -	/* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */
> -	if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) {
> -		if (net_ratelimit()) {
> -			if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM)) {
> -				dev_warn(&dev->dev,
> -					 "TX queue failure: out of memory\n");
> -			} else {
> -				dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
> +	int ret, i;
> +
> +	/* We normally do have space in the ring, so try to queue the skb as
> +	 * fast as possible. */
> +	ret = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
> +	if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> +		/* This triggers on the first xmit after ring full condition.
> +		 * We need to free up some skbs first. */
> +		if (likely(free_xmit_capacity(vi))) {
> +			ret = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
> +			/* This should never fail. Check, just in case. */
> +			if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
>  				dev_warn(&dev->dev,
>  					 "Unexpected TX queue failure: %d\n",
> -					 capacity);
> +					 ret);
> +				dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
> +				dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> +				kfree_skb(skb);
> +				return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>  			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* Ring full: it might happen if we get a callback while
> +			 * the queue is still mostly full. This should be
> +			 * extremely rare. */
> +			dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> +			kfree_skb(skb);
> +			goto stop;
>  		}
> -		dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> -		kfree_skb(skb);
> -		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>  	}
>  	virtqueue_kick(vi->svq);
> 
> @@ -603,18 +623,26 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  	skb_orphan(skb);
>  	nf_reset(skb);
> 
> -	/* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; stop the queue
> -	 * before it gets out of hand.  Naturally, this wastes entries. */
> -	if (capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> -		netif_stop_queue(dev);
> -		if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq))) {
> -			/* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
> -			free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> -			capacity = virtqueue_min_capacity(vi->svq);
> -			if (capacity >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> -				netif_start_queue(dev);
> -				virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq);
> -			}
> +	/* We transmit one skb, so try to free at least two pending skbs.
> +	 * This is so that we don't hog the skb memory unnecessarily. *
> +	 * Doing this after kick means there's a chance we'll free
> +	 * the skb we have just sent, which is hot in cache. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> +		free_old_xmit_skb(v);
> +
> +	if (likely(free_xmit_capacity(vi)))
> +		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +
> +stop:
> +	/* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; check capacity and stop
> +	 * the queue before it gets out of hand.
> +	 * Naturally, this wastes entries. */
> +	netif_stop_queue(dev);
> +	if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq))) {
> +		/* More just got used, free them and recheck. */
> +		if (free_xmit_capacity(vi)) {
> +			netif_start_queue(dev);
> +			virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq);
>  		}
>  	}
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/