Re: [patch 7/8] vmscan: memcg-aware unevictable page rescue scanner

[Johannes Weiner]

On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:01:34AM +0900, Hiroyuki Kamezawa wrote:
> 2011/6/3 Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Hiroyuki Kamezawa
> > <kamezawa.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> 2011/6/1 Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> Once the per-memcg lru lists are exclusive, the unevictable page
> >>> rescue scanner can no longer work on the global zone lru lists.
> >>>
> >>> This converts it to go through all memcgs and scan their respective
> >>> unevictable lists instead.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Hm, isn't it better to have only one GLOBAL LRU for unevictable pages ?
> >> memcg only needs counter for unevictable pages and LRU is not necessary
> >> to be per memcg because we don't reclaim it...
> >
> > Hmm. Are we suggesting to keep one un-evictable LRU list for all
> > memcgs? So we will have
> > exclusive lru only for file and anon. If so, we are not done to make
> > all the lru list being exclusive
> > which is critical later to improve the zone->lru_lock contention
> > across the memcgs
> >
> considering lrulock, yes, maybe you're right.

That's one of the complications.

> > Sorry If i misinterpret the suggestion here
> >
> 
> My concern is I don't know for what purpose this function is used ..

I am not sure how it's supposed to be used, either.  But it's
documented to be a 'really big hammer' and it's kicked off from
userspace.  So I suppose having the thing go through all memcgs bears
a low risk of being a problem.  My suggestion is we go that way until
someone complains.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/