Re: [PATCH] memcg: do not expose uninitialized mem_cgroup_per_nodeto world

[Igor Mammedov]

On 06/02/2011 01:10 AM, Hiroyuki Kamezawa wrote:
> > pc = list_entry(list->prev, struct page_cgroup, lru);
> Hmm, I disagree your patch is a fix for mainline. At least, a cgroup
> before completion of
> create() is not populated to userland and you never be able to rmdir()
> it because you can't
> find it.
>
>
>   >26:   e8 7d 12 30 00          call   0x3012a8
>   >2b:*  8b 73 08                mov    0x8(%ebx),%esi<-- trapping
> instruction
>   >2e:   8b 7c 24 24             mov    0x24(%esp),%edi
>   >32:   8b 07                   mov    (%edi),%eax
>
> Hm, what is the call 0x3012a8 ?
                pc = list_entry(list->prev, struct page_cgroup, lru);
                if (busy == pc) {
                        list_move(&pc->lru, list);
                        busy = 0;
                        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
                        continue;
                }
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags); <---- 
is  call 0x3012a8
                ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(pc, mem, GFP_KERNEL);

and  mov 0x8(%ebx),%esi
is dereferencing of 'pc' in inlined mem_cgroup_move_parent

I've looked at vmcore once more and indeed there isn't any parallel task
that touches cgroups code path.
Will investigate if it is xen to blame for incorrect data in place.

Thanks very much for your opinion.
> Thanks,
> -Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/