Re: bridge/netfilter: regression in 2.6.39.1

[Eric Dumazet]

Le lundi 06 juin 2011 Ã 13:48 +0200, Alexander Holler a Ãcrit :
> Am 06.06.2011 13:15, schrieb Neil Horman:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:21:06PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm getting a oops in the bridge code in br_change_mtu() with
> >> 2.6.39.1. The patch below seems to fix that.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure about the usage of dst_cow_metrics_generic() in
> >> fake_dst_ops, but after having a quick look at it seems to be ok to
> >> use that here.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Alexander
> >>
> > How did the flags of the dst entry on which we're callnig dst_entry_write_ptr
> > wind up getting the  READ_ONLY flag set on it?  I don't see how we'er falling
> > into that clause in which we call cow_metrics when we call dst_metric_set.  It
> > seems like that flag is set erroneously.  perhaps we should just update
> > fake_rtable.dst to have the correct flags?
> > Neil
> 
> It is set by that change:
> 
> --------
> @@ -124,7 +128,7 @@ void br_netfilter_rtable_init(struct net_bridge *br)
>   	atomic_set(&rt->dst.__refcnt, 1);
>   	rt->dst.dev = br->dev;
>   	rt->dst.path = &rt->dst;
> -	dst_metric_set(&rt->dst, RTAX_MTU, 1500);
> +	dst_init_metrics(&rt->dst, br_dst_default_metrics, true);
>   	rt->dst.flags	= DST_NOXFRM;
>   	rt->dst.ops = &fake_dst_ops;
>   }
> --------
> 
> The true in dst_init_metrics() is responsible for that flag.
> 

You are aware this change fixed an oops ?

read_only in this context means : In case this must be written, we make
a COW first
(allocate a piece of memory, copy the source in it before applying any
change)

It would be nice you send us the stack trace, so that we can have a clue
of whats going on.

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/