Re: Change in functionality of futex() system call.

[Eric Dumazet]

Le lundi 06 juin 2011 Ã 09:28 -0500, David Oliver a Ãcrit :
> Hello,
> 
> The functionality of the futex() system call appears to have changed
> between versions 2.6.18 and 2.6.32.28.
> 
> Specifically, performing a FUTEX_WAIT on a read-only mapped location
> results in an EFAULT. Although other operations, such as FUTEX_WAKE,
> are only meaningful for writable locations, FUTEX_WAIT is useful for
> processes with read-only access to a memory-mapped file.
> 
> The code below illustrates the changed behavior (each of the EXPECT
> operations succeed on the older kernel, the ASSERTs pass in each
> case), assuming the file /tmp/futex_test exists and contains int(42).
> 
> With the older kernel, the syscall() suspends until another process
> changes the file and issues a FUTEX_WAKE, whereas the new behavior is
> for an EFAULT error, independent of the file contents.
> 
> Let me know if you need further clarification.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> David Oliver.
> 
> 
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> typedef uint32_t u32;   // for futex.h
> #include <linux/futex.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include "gtest/gtest.h" // test framework to illustrate issue.
> 
> 
> TEST(Futex, futex_in_read_only_file_is_ok) {
>   int fd = open("/tmp/futex_test", O_RDONLY);
>   ASSERT_GE(fd, 0);
>   int* futex = static_cast<int *>(mmap(0, sizeof(int), PROT_READ,
> MAP_SHARED, fd, 0));
>   ASSERT_NE((int *)(0), futex);
> 
>   int rc = syscall(SYS_futex, futex, FUTEX_WAIT, 42, 0, 0, 0);
> 
>   EXPECT_NE(-1, rc);              // fails.
>   if (rc == -1) {
>       EXPECT_NE(errno, EFAULT);   // fails.
>   }
> }
> 

Right you are, this came from commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5 (futexes:
Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()) in 2.6.33

commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5c9468114e74dc050785d
Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Jan 5 16:32:43 2010 +0900

    futexes: Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()
    
    Currently, futexes have two problem:
    
    A) The current futex code doesn't handle private file mappings properly.
    
    get_futex_key() uses PageAnon() to distinguish file and
    anon, which can cause the following bad scenario:
    
      1) thread-A call futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAIT), it
         sleeps on file mapping object.
      2) thread-B writes a variable and it makes it cow.
      3) thread-B calls futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAKE), it
         wakes up blocked thread on the anonymous page. (but it's nothing)
    
    B) Current futex code doesn't handle zero page properly.

    Read mode get_user_pages() can return zero page, but current
    futex code doesn't handle it at all. Then, zero page makes
    infinite loop internally.
    
    The solution is to use write mode get_user_page() always for
    page lookup. It prevents the lookup of both file page of private
    mappings and zero page.
    
    Performance concerns:
    
    Probaly very little, because glibc always initialize variables
    for futex before to call futex(). It means glibc users never see
    the overhead of this patch.
    
    Compatibility concerns:
    
    This patch has few compatibility issues. After this patch,
    FUTEX_WAIT require writable access to futex variables (read-only
    mappings makes EFAULT). But practically it's not a problem,
    glibc always initalizes variables for futexes explicitly - nobody
    uses read-only mappings.
    
    Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
    Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxx>
    LKML-Reference: <20100105162633.45A2.A69D9226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/