Re: [debug patch] printk: Add a printk killswitch to robustify NMIwatchdog messages

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:45 +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:
> > As long as it doesn't scramble the order of the messages, the delay
> > imho doesn't matter even in very printk-heavy debugging sessions.
> 
> And, as important, doesn't reduce the throughput of printk. Having only
> 100 wakeups/s sounds like the throughput is limited to 100xsizeof(ring 
> buffer). 

Right, that's another problem.. not really sure delaying all this is
going to work :/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/