Re: drivers/drm/i915 maintenance process

[Keith Packard]

On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:36:18 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Can you keep drm-intel-next fairly up to date with respect to the fixes
> branch?  I.e. keep it a superset of drm-intel-fixes for the most part?

Yes, I wanted to do that now, but -fixes is not a fast-forward from
-next and I thought I shouldn't be doing rebases.

> In PCI-land, this means re-basing my -next tree periodically before the
> merge window opens (though not right before the merge window unless
> something unexpected happens, like a patch needing to be dropped; in
> that case I'll delay the merge window push a bit to allow for more
> testing).

If a rebase around -RC1 is reasonable, then I'll do that now and move
changes over to that.

-- 
keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature