Re: [PATCH] x86-64, vsyscalls: Rename UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS toCOMPAT_VSYSCALLS

[Ingo Molnar]

* pageexec@xxxxxxxxxxx <pageexec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> you called this feature "borderline security FUD" but have yet to 
> prove it.

No, i did not claim that this feature is "borderline security FUD", 
at all.

I said, and i quote my original reply to Linus:

 |
 | > Do you have *any* reason to call this "unsafe"?
 |
 | No, there's no reason at all for that. That naming is borderline
 | security FUD and last time i saw the series i considered renaming
 | it but got distracted :-)
 |

 https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/6/141

That the *NAMING* is borderline security FUD. (I already applied the 
patches before i wrote that mail, see the commit notifications on 
lkml.)

Either you have basic reading comprehension problems or you are
lying deliberately, putting words into my mouth that i never said.
Which one is it?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/