Re: XFS problem in 2.6.32

[Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG]

> whoever the maintainer of the -stable/-longterm tree is (be it an
> individual or a team employeed by some comapny) then looks at the patch
> and considers backporting it (if it's too hard, or to intrusive, they
> may decide not to).
So i have to contact Greg Kohan from SUSE directly?

> the idea of the lonterm kernels is that organizations need to maintain a
> kernel for a long time due to commitments that they have made (Debian
> doesn't want to change the kernel it ships in a stable version, RedHat
> doesn't want to change the kernel version in a RHEL release, etc), and
> so they publicly announce this so that anyone else wanting to use the
> same kernel version can share in the work (and therefor everyone can
> benifit from each other's work)
That was what i thoght. So a bug like this should get fixed right? 
Otherwise this makes no sense. Sadly Redhat has ported the fix back in 
his RHEL 6 2.6.32 kernel but they haven't send the patch to stable / 
vanilla team.

Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/