Re: [PATCH 2/5] Fix mismatched variable in rcutree_trace.c

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Tue Jun 07 2011 - 20:13:20 EST


On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:43:56AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Hmmm... Some arches have signed CPU numbers while others have unsigned
> > CPU numbers. I do use "-1" to mean "no CPU" in some cases (for example,
> > in rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity()), so I guess for consistency I should
> > be using "int" everywhere.
>
> Do I hear that "int" is ok for you? If yes I will not revise the patch
> and please merge it. If it needs changes please let me know.

Yep, "int" is OK. I queued your patch and am testing it now.

Thank you for catching this!

Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/