Re: [PATCH 0/15] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled

[Xiao Guangrong]

On 06/08/2011 11:11 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:58:06 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> The performance test result:
>>
>> Netperf (TCP_RR):
>> ===========================
>> ept is enabled:
>>
>>       Before         After
>> 1st   709.58         734.60
>> 2nd   715.40         723.75
>> 3rd   713.45         724.22
>>
>> ept=0 bypass_guest_pf=0:
>>
>>       Before         After
>> 1st   706.10         709.63
>> 2nd   709.38         715.80
>> 3rd   695.90         710.70
>>
> 
> In what condition, does TCP_RR perform so bad?
> 
> On 1Gbps network, directly connecting two Intel servers,
> I got 20 times better result before.
> 
> Even when I used a KVM guest as the netperf client,
> I got more than 10 times better result.
> 

Um, which case did you test? ept = 1 or ept=0 bypass_guest_pf=0 or both?

> Could you tell me a bit more details of your test?
> 

Sure, KVM guest is the client, and it uses e1000 NIC, and uses NAT
network connect to the netperf server, the bandwidth of our network
is 100M.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/