Re: [PATCH 09/10] MCE: run through processors with more severeproblems first

[Tony Luck]

2011/6/10 Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Well, I agree about the point that reordering is required to handle
> shared banks.

Thanks (and thanks for taking the time to look at all of this series
to provide such good feedback)

> I think it is better to put this change in early of the series.

Several of the early parts are position independent w.r.t. each
other - I'm not sure if there is some strong benefit to having
them in any particular order.

> I don't like to have multiple cpumasks here, notably one is just an
> inversion of another...

I wasn't completely thrilled with the way this turned out either.

> How about using severity-leveling?
> Pick cpus with PANIC level first, then AR, AO ...

That sounds like I need even more masks (or lists).

> Or how about checking rip in each mces_seen?

This is equivalent to what I did - but I think the code
will be cleaner. I'll give it a try.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/