[PATCH 1/3] ptrace_init_task: initialize child->jobctl explicitly
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Fri Jul 08 2011 - 13:16:51 EST
new_child->jobctl is not initialized during the fork, it is copied
from parent->jobctl. Currently this is harmless, the forking task
is running and copy_process() can't succeed if signal_pending() is
true, so only JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED can be copied. Still this is a
bit fragile, it would be more clean to set ->jobctl = 0 explicitly.
Also, check ->ptrace != 0 instead of PT_PTRACED, move the
CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT code up.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/ptrace.h | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- ptrace/include/linux/ptrace.h~3_init_jobctl 2011-07-07 18:34:44.000000000 +0200
+++ ptrace/include/linux/ptrace.h 2011-07-08 17:15:20.000000000 +0200
@@ -217,16 +217,17 @@ static inline void ptrace_init_task(stru
{
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&child->ptrace_entry);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&child->ptraced);
- child->parent = child->real_parent;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
+ atomic_set(&child->ptrace_bp_refcnt, 1);
+#endif
+ child->jobctl = 0;
child->ptrace = 0;
- if (unlikely(ptrace) && (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED)) {
+ child->parent = child->real_parent;
+
+ if (unlikely(ptrace) && current->ptrace) {
child->ptrace = current->ptrace;
__ptrace_link(child, current->parent);
}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
- atomic_set(&child->ptrace_bp_refcnt, 1);
-#endif
}
/**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/