Re: [PATCH] runtime-pm: consistent utilization of deferred_resume

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, July 08, 2011, Liu, ShuoX wrote:
> From 10bb3c851a0a9c9ca4d552743a371e3cfda81075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:59:06 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] runtime-pm: consistent utilization of deferred_resume
> 
> dev->power.deferred_resume is used as a bool typically, so change
> one assignment to false from 0, like other places.
> 
> Signed-off-by: ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next, will push for 3.1.

Thanks,
Rafael


> ---
>  drivers/base/power/runtime.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> index 0d4587b..af3d1a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
>  	retval = rpm_callback(callback, dev);
>  	if (retval) {
>  		__update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_ACTIVE);
> -		dev->power.deferred_resume = 0;
> +		dev->power.deferred_resume = false;
>  		if (retval == -EAGAIN || retval == -EBUSY)
>  			dev->power.runtime_error = 0;
>  		else
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/