Re: [PATCH x86/urgent 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularitycheck

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 07/09/2011 01:32 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> Ping?  If the change is too invasive at this stage, we can disable AMD
> NUMA on x86_32 for 3.0 and queue these two for 3.1.
> 

I am kind of leaning that way... Hans, what is your opinion?

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/