Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

From: Chris Ball
Date: Sat Jul 09 2011 - 18:10:11 EST


Hi Per,

On Fri, Jul 01 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
> It depends, the eMMC are much faster now
> compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to
> multiple cache levels and speculative cache pre-fetch. In relation the
> cost for handling the caches have increased and is now a bottle neck
> dealing with fast eMMC together with DMA.

Thanks very much, I've pushed v9 of the patchset to mmc-next for 3.1
(after fixing some merge conflicts against Adrian Hunter's recent patches
and rewording some of the commit message texts).

- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/