RE: [PATCHv3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Support for generic I/O power domains onEXYNOS4210

[Kukjin Kim]

Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> 
> Kukjin Kim wrote:

(snip)

> >> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ config MACH_NURI
> >>  	select EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI
> >>  	select EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY
> >>  	select SAMSUNG_DEV_PWM
> >> +	select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
> >
> > Do you _really_ think this should be under MACH_NURI?
> >
> This patch apply the generic power-domain to NURI board.

I mean, the PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS feature depends on CPU not board even though this is for only NURI board.

(snip)

> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h
> >> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..ab09034
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> >> +/* linux/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4.h
> >
> > According to your file name, should be linux/arch/arm/mach-
> exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h ?
> 
I said just typo...

+/* linux/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h

> This patch support only power-domain of EXYNOS4210, so I named "pm-
> exynos4210.h"
> If EXYNOS4 series board will be released, I will modify include file name
> from "pm-exynos4210.h" to "pm-exynos4.h" to support all EXYNOS4 series.

No need it, it's different.

(snip)

> > Would be better if you could add some common function for pd_power_up and
> _down...
> 
> What do you mean about common function?
> 
I thought, pd_power_up and _down can be implemented in one function.

(snip)

> > I wonder why we need to add this for handling power domain not update current
> pd.
> 
See arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dev-pd.c

I mean, we _really_ need to keep duplication files for handling power domain?...

(snip)

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/