>
> Using TIF_bits sounds like a much better solution for this, wakeups are
> really rather expensive and its best to avoid extra if at all possible.
The problem with using a TIF bit to tell a task that it needs to perform
some preempt_notifier registrations is that you end up with something that
looks a lot like preempt notifiers! You also don't escape the concurrent
read/write to thelist of pending registrations.
One thing I tried was simply using an RCU protected hlist for the preempt
notifiers so that we don't have to worry about atomicity when reading the
notifiers in finish_task_switch. It's a bit odd, since we know we only ever
have a single reader, but I've included it below anyway.
If anybody has any better ideas, I'm all ears.
+void preempt_notifier_register_task(struct preempt_notifier *notifier,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&tsk->preempt_notifiers_mutex);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(¬ifier->link,&tsk->preempt_notifiers);
+ mutex_unlock(&tsk->preempt_notifiers_mutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_register_task);
+
+void preempt_notifier_unregister_task(struct preempt_notifier *notifier,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&tsk->preempt_notifiers_mutex);
+ hlist_del_rcu(¬ifier->link);
+ mutex_unlock(&tsk->preempt_notifiers_mutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_unregister_task);
+
/**
* preempt_notifier_register - tell me when current is being preempted& rescheduled
* @notifier: notifier struct to register
*/
void preempt_notifier_register(struct preempt_notifier *notifier)
{
- hlist_add_head(¬ifier->link,¤t->preempt_notifiers);
+ preempt_notifier_register_task(notifier, current);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_register);