On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 01:18:46PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:Sure.On 08/02/2011 01:11 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:42:43PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:Sure, I see, thanks Dmitry.On 08/02/2011 12:13 PM, Anirudh Ghayal wrote:+/*Anirudh, It's should be @work?
+ * struct pm8xxx_vib - structure to hold vibrator data
+ * @vib_input_dev: input device supporting force feedback
+ * @vwork: work structure to set the vibration parameters
Looks like it, I can fix it up locally, no need to resubmit.
BTW, please do not hesitate to add your Reviewed-by or Acked-by if you
are mostly satisfied with the patch (sans a few minor issues that you
should point out). I can't guarantee that I will always add your tags
(depends on when I commit the patch to my one of my public branches) but
I will try to do so.
Thanks.
So was this reviewed-by? ;)