Re: [PATCH] Staging: cx25821: fix coding style issues

From: Leonid V. Fedorenchik
Date: Tue Aug 02 2011 - 05:19:17 EST


Thanks for the review. I sent v2. I have a question, however...

On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:14:22 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 17:33 +0800, Leonid V. Fedorenchik wrote:
> > Fix too long lines in cx25821-audio.h and cx25821-core.c
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/cx25821/cx25821-core.c b/drivers/staging/cx25821/cx25821-core.c
> []
> > @@ -972,8 +972,8 @@ static int cx25821_dev_setup(struct cx25821_dev *dev)
> > dev->lmmio = ioremap(dev->base_io_addr, pci_resource_len(dev->pci, 0));
> >
> > if (!dev->lmmio) {
> > - CX25821_ERR
> > - ("ioremap failed, maybe increasing __VMALLOC_RESERVE in page.h\n");
> > + CX25821_ERR("ioremap failed, maybe increasing __VMALLOC_RESERVE"
> > + " in page.h\n");
>
> Please do not split formats.

What is the reason to not split formats?
I can see that in Documentation/CodingStyle in Chapter 2 it is OK to split
formats if it is not making readability worse.
So, is it for the sake of readability or is it new coding style rule for the
kernel that is not in documentation yet or something else or am I misunderstood
something?

Leonid V. Fedorenchik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/