Re: [PATCH 2/7] perf, x86: Implement IBS initialization

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Aug 02 2011 - 07:49:45 EST


On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:46 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> +/*
> + * This runs only on the current cpu. We try to find an LVT offset and
> + * setup the local APIC. For this we must disable preemption. On
> + * success we initialize all nodes with this offset. This updates then
> + * the offset in the IBS_CTL per-node msr. The per-core APIC setup of
> + * the IBS interrupt vector is handled by perf_ibs_cpu_notifier that
> + * is using the new offset.
> + */
> +static int force_ibs_eilvt_setup(void)
> +{
> + int offset;
> + int ret;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + /* find the next free available EILVT entry, skip offset 0 */
> + for (offset = 1; offset < APIC_EILVT_NR_MAX; offset++) {
> + if (get_eilvt(offset))
> + break;
> + }
> + preempt_enable();
> +
> + if (offset == APIC_EILVT_NR_MAX) {
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "No EILVT entry available\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + ret = setup_ibs_ctl(offset);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!ibs_eilvt_valid()) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pr_err(FW_BUG "using offset %d for IBS interrupts\n", offset);
> + pr_err(FW_BUG "workaround enabled for IBS LVT offset\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +out:
> + preempt_disable();
> + put_eilvt(offset);
> + preempt_enable();
> + return ret;
> +}

So I don't get any of that preempt_disable/enable crap in this patch,
but the above is esp. confusing. How is that preempt_disable() at out:
still valid? We could be running on an entirely different cpu from when
we did get_eilvt at the start.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/