Re: [PATCH] shm: optimize exit_shm()

From: Vasiliy Kulikov
Date: Wed Aug 03 2011 - 15:41:35 EST


On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 21:29 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/03, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 21:08 +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > > > +
> > > >        /* Destroy all already created segments, but not mapped yet */
> > > >        down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
> > > >        if (shm_ids(ns).in_use)
> > >
> > > This check here is now unnecessary, yes?
> >
> > No, as I said in the comment above, other task may be holding the mutex and
> > deleting the last shm segment. So, current task will see in_use == 1
> > before down_write(), but == 0 after it.
>
> And? Why we can not do idr_for_each() in this (unikely) case?

Because it's pointless. idr_for_each() would not find any used segment.

> > > And this also fixes the oops.
> >
> > Yes, but it only hides the real problem - tasks' dependency on initialized
> > init_*_ns.
>
> This is true, but your patch has the same dependency, but pretends
> it doesn't ;) and it complicates the code.

I didn't say that .in_use check fixes the oops. The description says
nothing about it. It does an optimization, which is said in the
description.

--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/