Re: will someone make 2.6.39.* a longterm ?
From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Aug 03 2011 - 20:56:37 EST
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:51:03PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Hello Greg ,
>
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:05:58PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> >> Hello All , Is anyone looking at making 2.6.39.* into a longterm
> >>stable ?
> >
> >No, why would they?
> >
> >Or, to turn it the other way, why do you feel .39 would be a viable
> >longer kernel to maintain? What are you using it for that requires it
> >to be handled in this manner?
> >thanks,
> >greg k-h
> Probably no reason at all , But ... It is the final 2.6 kernel version .
But what does that really mean? There is no "real" difference between
2.6.39 and 3.0 that is not the same difference between 2.6.38 and
2.6.39.
> With 3.0 being released there will only be Yours & the others
> maintaining the 2.6.<39 otherwise .
Is that a problem?
> Ego I guess .
Whose?
confused.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/