Re: [PATCH] devtmpfs: Fix section mismatch on devtmpfsd()

[Grant Likely]

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:36:11PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>> devtmpfsd_init() references setup_done which is __initdata, but
>> devtmpfsd() is not an __init function.  The code is fine, because it
>> is never referenced after discarding __init sections, but it leaves
>> some additional code that can be discarded with the rest of __init and
>> it causes gcc to complain with a section mismatch warning.
>
> I have a simpler patch here that just removes the __initdata function,
> which is simpler.
>
> I hate the initdata stuff, it's almost always pointless...

initdata I don't mind.  Discarding stuff that is no longer necessary
isn't a bad thing and I don't find it that onerous.  __devinit* seems
less useful since I've never worked on a system that can actually
discard it.

> Would that solve the problem for you as well?

Sure.  I was just doing random sparc builds and fixing up the bugs I
ran into.  I'm happy with that solution too.

g.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/