Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Having perf use libparsevent.a

[Ingo Molnar]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo, I was trying to do as you said, but to do so would require a 
> lot of restructuring of the perf code base. I started talking with 
> Arnaldo, as he's doing a lot of the work in the tools/perf code, 
> and he's the one that suggested that I do it this way. It made 
> things a lot easier.

Could you guys please talk some more and clear it up? There's 
absolutely no technical reason why tools/perf/lib/ (or 
tools/perf/libperf/) should be harder than tools/lib/.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/