Re: [PATCH] regulator: Ensure enough enable time for max8649

From: Liam Girdwood
Date: Mon Aug 08 2011 - 12:44:43 EST


On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 12:54 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Integer division may truncate the result, thus max8649_enable_time() may return
> slightly shorter enable time. This patch fixes it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/max8649.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8649.c b/drivers/regulator/max8649.c
> index 30eb9e5..1062cf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/max8649.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/max8649.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int max8649_enable_time(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> ret = (ret & MAX8649_RAMP_MASK) >> 5;
> rate = (32 * 1000) >> ret; /* uV/uS */
>
> - return (voltage / rate);
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP(voltage, rate);
> }
>
> static int max8649_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int mode)

Applied.

Thanks

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/