Re: [RESEND][PATCH 0/5] Support for the TS-5500 board
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Wed Aug 10 2011 - 15:09:27 EST
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:20:46 +0100,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just expose these devices in the device-tree. You shouldn't *need* a
> new MTD device driver; physmap_of should be just fine.
I didn't write a new MTD device driver, but just moved the already
existing one to the ts5500 platform directory. The point is that my
TS-5500 doesn't have this flash, so I couldn't try. The fifth patch
from this set could just be ignored.
> If your bootloader doesn't pass one, your platform-specific code
> should just register its own device-tree blob during early boot. And
> your device drivers should just match against the devices therein.
I'm a bit confused with what should be done for the support for an
embedded platform (X86-based) like this TS-5500. Is the actual code
hierarchy OK? What is the impact of adding a device-tree to this code?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/