On Wed 10-08-11 22:59:42, Raghavendra K T wrote:Yes you are right, There is no much significant reason. since source file patch was so huge and viable for conflicts, thought it would apply clean easily.The memcg code sometimes uses "struct mem_cgroup *mem" and sometimes uses
"struct mem_cgroup *memcg". This patch renames all mem variables to memcg in header file.
Any reason (other than that this is a different file) to have this as a
separate patch?
(snip)
From: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 5633f51..fb1ed1c 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_end(void);
extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page);
extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page);
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email:<a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx</a>