[PATCH 18/41] OpenRISC: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv()

From: Matt Fleming
Date: Thu Aug 11 2011 - 10:02:30 EST

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>

Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call
it. This also fixes a race because sa_handler was being modified
without holding ->sighand->siglock.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
index 5f759c7..c023db9 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
@@ -257,9 +257,7 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,

- if (sig == SIGSEGV)
- ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
- force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ force_sigsegv(sig, current);

static inline void

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/