Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Output stall data in debugfs
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thu Aug 11 2011 - 14:48:29 EST
Alex Neronskiy <zakmagnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Alex Neronskiy <zakmagnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Instead of using the log, use debugfs for output of both stall
> lengths and stack traces. Printing to the log can result in
> watchdog touches,
Why? Because of printk being slow or something else?
The first could be probably workarounded, especially if you
already have "two buffers"
> distorting the very events being measured.
> Additionally, the information will not distract from lockups
> when users view the log.
> A two-buffer system is used to ensure that the trace information
> can always be recorded without contention.
This implies that kernel bug reports will often not contain the
back trace, right? Seems like a bad thing to me because it will
make bug reports worse.
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/